Sunday 25 December 2011

Samsung Galaxy Y Duos and Y Pro Duos announced




Samsung introduced a couple of new Android-running smartphones with support for two SIM slots each. The Samsung Galaxy Y Duos and Samsung Galaxy Y Pro Duos are entry-level offerings, designed to cater for the needs of emerging markets.
Both new Duos smartphones run on Android 2.3 Gingerbread and come with 3 megapixel fixed-focus cameras. They share a very decent connectivity set, including 7.2Mbps HSDPA, Wi-Fi, GPS, Bluetooth and microUSB, plus FM radio and a 3.5mm audio jack.
The Samsung Galaxy Y Duos is an all-touch smartphone with a 3.14" QVGA (320x240 pixel resolution) screen. It comes with 512MB of internal memory that is expandable by up to 32GB through the microSD card slot and 384MB of RAM. There's going to be a 2GB microSD card included in the retail package for the dual-SIM smartphone.
The Samsung Galaxy Y Pro Duos sacrifices some screen area for a full QWERTY keyboard and comes with a 2.6" QVGA LCD with landscape orientation. It has the same amount of storage and RAM as its keyboard-less sibling, but comes with a slightly larger battery (1350 mAh vs 1300 mAh).
The Samsung Galaxy Y Pro Duos leaked a couple of times last week, so we can't really say we are surprised to see it go official now.
There's no information about the availability or pricing of either of the newly announced Duos smartphones, but we'll do our best to keep you updated once it comes up.


Samsung I929 Galaxy S II Duos with dual-network support pops up







Porsche Design BlackBerry P'9981 comes to the UK




Samsung explains why Galaxy S and Tab 7.0 won't get Android ICS


When Samsung announced the list of phones and tablets to get the Android Ice Cream Sandwich update, there were many questions of why certain models didn't make the cut. The originalGalaxy S for one was quite a surprise, since the nearly identicalNexus S is already getting the update.
Samsung issued an official statement explaining why the the I9000 Galaxy S and the Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.0 won't get to taste official ICS.
Both feature Samsung's TouchWiz customizations which run pretty deep (they include things like custom widgets, video calling and so on), and they also have country-specific customizations (like the ISDB-Tb Digital TV tuner for Brazil) along with carrier-mandated changes.
All those customizations will not run smoothly on the older hardware if ported to Ice Cream Sandwich, with limited RAM and ROM storage pointed out as problematic.
Samsung's statement talks only of the Galaxy S and the Tab 7.0, but other Galaxy phones that are not on the ICS update list most likely suffer from similar restraints so they'll remain on Gingerbread too.
Of course, there are plenty of third-party ROMs available out there that will put an unmodified Ice Cream Sandwich (that is no TouchWiz) on your Galaxy droid - we already tried one out and it worked rather well.

AT&T Gets Airwaves Approval


Federal regulators approved AT&T Inc.'s $1.9 billion acquisition of airwaves from Qualcomm Inc. on Thursday, giving AT&T a much-needed boost after its deal to acquire T-Mobile USA fell apart.
The Federal Communications Commission signed off on the deal Thursday on a 3-1 vote, with minor conditions, FCC officials said. The approval means that AT&T and Qualcomm could close the deal by the end of the year.
An AT&T spokesman had no comment on the FCC's decision.
The licenses AT&T is purchasing from Qualcomm would be used to supplement its next-generation LTE network nationally and give it more bandwidth for customer downloads.
FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski proposed approving the Qualcomm deal in November, while simultaneously announcing serious concerns about the T-Mobile deal and pushing it toward a longer review. The FCC concerns and a Justice Department lawsuit forced AT&T and T-Mobile USA parent company Deutsche Telekom AG to pull the plug on the deal this week.
AT&T's need for the Qualcomm spectrum has increased in recent weeks, after its T-Mobile deal fell apart and rival Verizon Wireless announced a $3.6 billion deal to acquire unused airwaves from Spectrum Co., a coalition of cable companies that includes Comcast Corp. On Dec. 17, Verizon also announced plans to buy airwaves from Cox Communications for $315 million.
The acquisitions would give Verizon significantly more capacity on its national LTE voice and data network and help the company avoid the sort of network congestion issues that have plagued AT&T in some markets.
AT&T is acquiring spectrum licenses that Qualcomm used for its now-defunct over-the-air pay-television service, FLO TV. The frequencies cover more than 300 million people across the U.S., including major metropolitan areas such as New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco. Since the airwaves can only be used for downloads—not uploads—AT&T plans to use them to boost the download capacity of its fourth-generation LTE network.
Federal regulators imposed few conditions on the deal, mostly involving interference protections and requirements to offer data roaming to competitors. Despite fierce lobbying from smaller wireless companies, the agency didn't impose a condition requiring that handsets using AT&T's frequencies be interoperable with other nearby airwaves. Smaller wireless companies have complained that AT&T and Verizon Wireless are designing their LTE networks so that smaller companies won't be able to use the same handsets or provide data roaming. Smaller companies wanted interoperability requirements on AT&T's 700 MHz LTE airwaves so regional carriers could get data roaming and consumers could use any LTE phone they want on 4G networks.
AT&T argued the FCC shouldn't require interoperability with nearby airwaves and said the restriction would delay the company's efforts to build out its LTE network. The agency sided with AT&T on the argument, but FCC officials said that they will conduct an industry-wide examination of whether new interoperability rules are needed on 4G LTE airwaves early next year.

Major university chooses Google Apps over Microsoft Office 365

Organizations everywhere are debating the best way to migrate systems to the cloud. And one of the biggest decisions they face is the best cloud provider for their needs

The University of California-Berkeley just went through an exhaustive process to choose a new cloud-based email and calendar provider, weighing options from both Google Apps and Microsoft’s Office 365. (The University of Washington just went through a similar process as it ditched its old Alpine email system earlier this year).
Now, here’s what Berkeley concluded after looking at both Google Apps and Office 365 to replace its CalMail system.
“While both products are feature rich and offer advantages over our current environment, the analysis concluded that the Google offering was the better overall fit for the campus at this time,” university officials wrote in a message earlier this week.
But now here’s the really interesting part. The university went beyond the traditional press release by laying out a detailed analysis of how Google Apps and Office 365 perform in critical areas.
As you’ll see in the Berkeley matrix assessment, it wasn’t a slam dunk for Google. Microsoft got higher marks in security, contract terms and ease-of-use with its calendar functionality.
(Msnbc.com is a joint venture between Microsoft and NBC Universal.)
But Berkeley decided to go with Google in part because it was easier to roll out and many of its students and faculty were already familiar with Gmail. Berkeley officials noted that Office 365 is still very much a new service. And they pointed out that one of the early adopters of the technology, The University of Nebraska, still had not migrated its email system to the 
The report also notes that Microsoft’s previous online service offerings — BPOS and Live@EDU — did not have “exceptional track records for performance.”
“Google’s solution is optimized for web-based interaction,” the report says. “It is designed to be quickly provisioned and a migration to Google could begin more quickly than one to Office 365.” The university estimated that it would take six to 10 weeks to migrate systems to Google.

Expect lots of Kindle Fires under the tree on Christmas


Looks like Amazon has figured out how to take a bite out of the proverbial Apple tablet market with the recent launch of its Kindle Fire. The newest Kindle has been Amazon's top seller heading into Christmas, and it appears the Internet giant has put forth the right mix of features, price and user experience that so many other Android-based tablets have failed to do.
If the iPad is the gold standard for tablets, Kindle Fire is the silver standard because for $199, they are flying off the shelves. Amazon took a chance on this price point by actually losing a few bucks per unit. The gamble seems to be working. The newest Kindle has sold millions of units since September and has fired itself into the number two position, albeit miles away from King iPad.
Amazon's bet is that consumers will happily tap their credit card numbers into Amazon's vast library of books, games, music and movies, which should more than make up for their gap in production costs. In fact, a $79 annual subscription to Amazon Prime will give customers a seemingly endless supply of entertainment options to keep their new tablets burning bright.
Kindle Fire is by no means a device that was designed to compete with iPad2, nor could it at such a low price. Instead, Amazon looked at what consumers wanted in a tablet: Web browsing, email, games, music and movies along with its niche market of books, magazines and, of course, Angry Birds. In order to meet budget, they kept a slim 7-inch display, left out the camera and opted for free cloud–based storage as the only option outside of its standard 8 gigs on-board capacity.
Several no-name makers have tried to compete for this entry-level market but with inferior products. There is nothing more annoying than a touchscreen device with a lousy touchscreen and weak display. The Kindle Fire sports a responsive and rich screen that renders in 1024 X 600, while its dual-core processor ensures speedy navigation. Its bookshelf-styled interface takes a little getting used to but certainly makes sense.
Rightfully, Kindle fans might be upset that the E-ink display that redefined reading books on previous models was replaced. While this was meant to be a tablet/e-reader hybrid, the scale certainly seems to tilt toward the former.
The science project for me was watching the Fire in action at a local big-box retailer. The device quickly stands out as the best value between the iPad2, cheap knock-offs and a sea of traditional Android offerings. Kindle Fires were literally flying off the shelf. Employees were restocking the shelf for what they said was the second time that morning. The scene compelled me to put one in my buggy.
It's a safe bet to say that there will be a Fire under a lot of trees today.